Drag queen Pattie Gonia has raised $4 million for climate causes, hiked 100 miles in heels, and now faces a trademark lawsuit from Patagonia. A profile of activism at the intersection of drag and environmental justice.
Patagonia sued environmental activist and drag performer Pattie Gonia — real name Wyn Wiley — in January 2026, seeking $1 in damages and legal fees. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Los Angeles, alleges trademark infringement over Wiley's use of the name "Pattie Gonia" for clothing and activism. But the legal battle only amplifies a remarkable story of a performer who has raised nearly $4 million for non‑profits since starting her drag persona.
Last year alone, Pattie Gonia raised $1 million by hiking 100 miles in full drag from Point Reyes National Seashore to San Francisco.
Wiley, who performs as Pattie Gonia, has accumulated millions of followers online through a mix of high‑fashion drag and uncompromising environmental advocacy. The 100-mile hike — complete with heels, wigs, and makeup — became a viral sensation, proving that drag can be a vehicle for climate action that reaches audiences traditional environmental groups often miss.
Wiley's approach blends performance art with direct action, challenging the stereotype that environmentalism is a movement for straight, cisgender, able‑bodied people. By centering drag, Pattie Gonia expands who sees themselves as an environmentalist.
Patagonia filed its lawsuit after Wiley applied to trademark "Pattie Gonia" for clothing and environmental advocacy in September 2025. The outdoor clothing company claims the name would "irreparably harm" its brand, which has spent 50 years building recognition around its own name derived from the Patagonia region. In a public statement, Patagonia said:
"While we wish we didn’t have to do this — and actively engaged with Pattie for several years to avoid this — it has become necessary to protect the brand we have spent the last 50 years building."
Wiley responded by accusing Patagonia of "trying to erase an activist." The lawsuit demands a nominal $1 in damages plus legal fees, but the symbolic stakes are high. Pattie Gonia has used the Patagonia name in her branding for years, as seen in her iconic puffy jacket and outdoor gear in photos. The dispute highlights a growing tension between corporate trademark enforcement and the ethos of grassroots activism.
The case raises broader questions about who owns cultural narratives in the outdoor industry. Patagonia, built on a reputation for environmental responsibility, now finds itself in court against one of the most visible young activists in that space.
The 100‑mile hike from Point Reyes to San Francisco was more than a fundraiser — it was a statement. In full drag, with heels, padding, and makeup, Pattie Gonia walked and danced her way across the California coast, drawing media coverage and online engagement that a standard climate march rarely achieves. The hike raised $1 million and inspired a new wave of outdoor advocacy that centers queer joy and resilience.
Visibility like this matters because it challenges who counts as an environmentalist. The outdoor industry has long been dominated by images of white, thin, able‑bodied adventurers. Pattie Gonia's drag injects camp, humor, and glamour into a movement that often takes itself too seriously — and in doing so, invites people who never felt welcome to participate. Tech companies have also begun celebrating LGBTQ+ Pride, but few have integrated climate justice as thoroughly as Pattie Gonia's platform does.
By existing at the intersection of drag and environmentalism, Pattie Gonia also carves space for LGBTQ+ people in the green movement. Climate change disproportionately affects queer and trans communities, yet those voices are often sidelined. Pattie Gonia's work insists that climate justice and queer liberation are inseparable.